Nick Coghlan wrote: > Brett C. wrote: > >> OK, thanks to John Ehresman here at PyCon sprint I got logistix's >> patch applied. Beyond a warning that a warning that decode_unicode() >> is never called and the parser module failing to compile under Windows >> everything should be fine for compiling the AST branch. > > > Under Linux (Suse 9.1), the parser module compiles with a couple of > warnings about implicit declaration of PyParser_SimpleParseString, but > the .so fails to load due to a missing symbol PyNode_Compile. >
It's a known issue. I am just ignoring the failed compile. >> Passing the test suite, though, is another question. =) > > > Heh. I managed to get test_grammar to pass 100% last night, which is at > least a start! > Yeah, I am hoping to look at your generators patch before you get back in the country. > And I must say that the new system is rather nice to work with - it took > me a while to work out what was going on, but the multi-pass 'build > AST', 'build symbol table', 'compile AST' is much cleaner than it is > with the lists-of-lists arrangement on the trunk (which is the entire > point of the AST-branch, I guess. . .) > How the system works will be *much* clearer with the new version of Python/compile.txt, assuming everyone has not been lying to me about the clarity. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
