Eric Nieuwland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Given the ideas so far, would it possible to: > > def meta(cls): > ... > > @meta > class X(...): > ...
It is not implemented in Python 2.4. From what I understand, making it happen in Python 2.5 would not be terribly difficult. The question is about a "compelling use case". Is there a use where this syntax is significantly better, easier, etc., than an equivalent metaclass? Would people use the above syntax if it were available? What would you use the above syntax to do? - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
