"Nick Coghlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > statement expansion", I think we can expect EXPR to produce a value > > that is already an iterator (rather than merely an interable). > > Not supporting iterables makes it harder to write a class which is > inherently usable in a with block, though. The natural way to make > iterable classes is to use 'yield' in the definition of __iter__ - if > iter() is not called, then that trick can't be used.
Would not calling iter() (or .__iter__) explicitly, instead of depending on the implicit call of for loops, suffice to produce the needed iterator? tjr _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
