On 4/26/05, Robert Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Jim] > > Absolutely. Even giving up the XXX_FAST optimizations would > > still require new bytecode to not assume them.
> I'm afraid I'm only familiar with CPython, but wouldn't callee locals > just map to XXX_FAST indices via the caller's co_names tuple? Only if all names are in the caller's tuple. In your example at http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2005-April/052924.html two of the callees wanted a shared old_children, but that name didn't appear in the caller, so I wouldn't expect the compiler to make room for it in the tuple. -jJ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
