Hi, Sounds like a useful requirement to have for new features in 2.x, IMO. that is... "demonstrated need".
If the feature implies that the app needs to be designed from the ground up to *really* take advantage of the feature, then, maybe leave it for Guido's sabbatical (e.g. Python 3000). On 5/3/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be great if we could point to some code in the standard library > or in a major Python application that would be better (cleaner, faster, > or clearer) if re-written using blocks and block-iterators. I've > scanned through the code base looking for some places to apply the idea > and have come up empty handed. This could mean that I've not yet > grasped the essence of what makes the idea useful or it may have other > implications such as apps needing to be designed from the ground-up with > block iterators in mind. > > Raymond -- LD Landis - N0YRQ - from the St Paul side of Minneapolis _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
