Shane Holloway (IEEE) wrote:
> Another thing. In the specification of the Anonymous Block function, is
> there a reason that "itr = EXPR1" instead of "itr = iter(EXPR1)"? It
> seems to be a dis-symmetry with the 'for' loop specification.
Hmm... yeah. That's strange. In fact, if it gets changed to "itr =
iter(EXPR1)", as it probably ought to, all of the existing examples will
continue to work. It will also be safe to start block iterators with a
single variable, nullifying my argument about parentheses.
So Reinhold's examples stand, except for the "try" block, since it
clashes with a keyword. They read well, but when something goes wrong
in the code, how would a new programmer crack these nuts?
with:
(...)
synchronized:
(...)
transaction:
(...)
> Thanks,
> -Shane (Holloway) ;)
Once in a while I read a post by Shane H????way and start wondering when
I wrote it and how I could've forgotten about it. And then I realize I
didn't. :-)
Shane
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
