On Fri, 6 May 2005, Guido van Rossum wrote: > There's one alternative possible (still orthogonal to PEP 340): > instead of __next__(), we could add an optional argument to the next() > method, and forget about the next() built-in.
I prefer your original proposal. I think this is a good time to switch to next(). If we are going to change the protocol, let's do it right. -- ?!ng _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
