Jp Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If such a construct is to be introduced, the ideal spelling would seem to > be: > > for [VAR in] EXPR: > BLOCK1 > finally: > BLOCK2
Does this mean that adding finally: pass to a for block would make the for loop behave differently? Cheers, mwh -- I really hope there's a catastrophic bug in some future e-mail program where if you try and send an attachment it cancels your ISP account, deletes your harddrive, and pisses in your coffee -- Adam Rixey _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com