Jp Calderone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>   If such a construct is to be introduced, the ideal spelling would seem to 
> be:
>
>     for [VAR in] EXPR:
>         BLOCK1
>     finally:
>         BLOCK2

Does this mean that adding 

    finally:
        pass

to a for block would make the for loop behave differently?

Cheers,
mwh

-- 
  I really hope there's a catastrophic bug in some future e-mail
  program where if you try and send an attachment it cancels your
  ISP account, deletes your harddrive, and pisses in your coffee
                                                         -- Adam Rixey
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to