Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [...] But some of the claims from PEP 3XX seem to be incorrect now: Nick
> claims that a with-statement can abstract an except clause, but that's
> not the case; [...]
Sorry for being a lurker, but can I try and expand this point.
The options:
- If we don't allow the except clause in the generator, the exception
can't be examined there.
- If we do allow the except clause we must (IMO) also allow the
generator to suppress the exception. It would be surprising behaviour if
an a caught exception was re-raised without an explicit raise statement.
An argument:
Despite the control-flow-macros-are-harmful discussion, I see nothing
wrong with a block controller swallowing its block's exceptions because:
- In most proposals it can raise its own exception in place of the
block's exception anyway.
- In the following example there is nothing surprising if controller()
swallows block()'s exception:
def block():
# do stuff
raise E
controller(block)
Perhaps we don't want the block controller statement to have as much
power over its block as controller() has over block() above. But
handling an exception is not so radical is it?
- Arnold.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
