At 04:44 PM 5/19/2005 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: >Michael Hudson wrote: > > > This is, to me, neat and clear. I don't find the idea that iterators > > are tied to exactly 1 for loop an improvement (even though they > > usually will be). > >To fix this in a fully backward-compatible way, we >need some way of distinguishing generators that >expect to be finalized.
No, we don't; Guido's existing proposal is quite sufficient for using yield. We dont' need to create another old/new distinction here. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
