Raymond Hettinger wrote: >> > If Fred were up for it, I think ElementTree would be a wonderful, >> > must-have addition. > >> I might be missing fine details of the English language here >> (what does "to be up for something" mean?), however, I believe >> ElementTree is an unlikely addition to the standard library. > > Rewritten: > > If Fredrik Lundh were supportive of the idea, I think the Standard > Library would benefit greatly from incorporating ElementTree.
shipping stable versions of ElementTree/cElementTree (or PIL, or python- doc, or exemaker, or what else you might find useful) with official Python releases is perfectly okay. moving the main trunk and main development over to the Python CVS is another thing, entirely. </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
