Michael McLay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this would be feature creep. It complicates the language
> for a very small gain. While the added syntax would be intuitive, it
> only saves a line or two over the existing syntax.
FWIW, this is my opinion too (and I've written a bunch of while
True:...if x: break loops today, even).
It would be much nicer if people spent time worrying about the
threads in multiple subinterpreters bug, or why
def sc(*classes):
return type('', classes, {})
sc(sc(str), sc(str))
fails.
Cheers,
mwh
--
Guido (like us!) is a bit schizophrenic here: he wants to be a
benevolent dictator, but also wants to treat people like
grownups. This probably worked better before Python got a large
American audience <0.9 wink>. -- Tim Peters, 10 Feb 2000
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
