Nick Coghlan wrote: > With PEP 315, a do-while loop would look like: > > do: > <body> > while <cond>: > pass > > But then, I'm reasonably happy with the 'break out of an infinite > loop' approach, so *shrug*.
From Programming Languages 101 I remember this construct in Algol 68. It was then claimed to be *the* universal loop construct. If that is true __and__ it is easy to implement, I'd say +INF for PEP 315. --eric _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
