Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [Nick Coghlan]
>
>>And here we see why I'm such a fan of the term 'deferred expression'
>>instead of 'anonymous function'.
>>
>>Python's lambda expressions *are* the former, but they are
>>emphatically *not* the latter.
>
> Let me emphatically disagree. Your POV is entirely syntactical, which
> IMO is a shallow perspective. Semantically, lambdas ARE anonymous
> functions, and that's what counts.
Interesting. Knowing this, I think I better understand your desire to
get rid of lambda expressions for Py3K.
> Since "deferred expression" is not defined in Python, you can't
> reasonably argue about whether that's what lambdas are, but
> intuitively for me the term refers to something more lightweight than
> lambdas.
As you say, it is a matter of looking at lambdas based on what the
current syntax restricts them to (i.e. single expressions), rather
than what the underlying machinery is capable of (i.e. full-fledged
functions).
> Now, whether the use cases for lambdas are better served by anonymous
> functions or by something else that might be called deferred
> expression, I don't know yet.
Like you (judging by your stated goals for Py3K), I don't have any use
cases for full anonymous functions - named functions serve that role
quite happily for me.
Where I find lambda expressions useful is the role that Python's
current syntax restricts them too - functions which consist of a
single (usually simple) expression. For those, pulling the expression
out and naming it would just end up hiding the meaningful sections of
code behind a few pieces of boilerplate
> But as long as we are describing the
> present state we should call a spade a spade, etc.
I guess I take a syntactic view of the status quo, because, while
lambdas may be implemented as anonymous functions, the current syntax
doesn't let me *write* an arbitrary function as a lambda.
Regardless, I believe the balance will eventually tip in some
direction - either lambdas disappear entirely, become able support
full anonymous functions, or else the idea of a 'deferred expression'
becomes a defining characteristic, rather than a syntactic quirk.
I figure it's all Py3K type stuff though, without any great urgency
associated with it.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
