On Thu, Jun 30, 2005, Barry Warsaw wrote: > > If there are no objections, I propose to do the following (only in > Python 2.4 and 2.5): > > * Add set.union_update() as an alias for set.update(). > * Add to docstrings for all methods that 't' can be any iterable. > * Update texinfo documentation to add Set.update() and > set.union_update() and explain that all can take iterables > > I consider this a bug in 2.4, not a new feature, because without it, it > makes more work in porting applications.
+0 (I'm only not +1 because I don't use sets much -- I'm still mired in Python 2.2 -- but I'm always happy to see inconsistencies resolved) I'll guess that Raymond will probably want 2.5 to have set.union_update() get a PendingDeprecationWarning. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ f u cn rd ths, u cn gt a gd jb n nx prgrmmng. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
