On 7/1/05, Aahz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My suspicion is that someone at some point thought that Cowlishaw was > sufficient; we probably should write some base-level docs that explain > the Python mechanisms and refer to Cowlishaw for details.
Well, it's already well explained, with examples and all, in the PEP 327: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0327.html#rounding-algorithms I'll point to there from the Money PEP, but I think this should be somewhere in the docs. I mean, as a final user, you shouldn't read a PEP or a 3rd party doc to know how to use a module. . Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
