Nick Coghlan wrote:
[...]
> If the right hand side of 'as' permitted the same forms as are going
> to be permitted for the 'as' clause in 'with' statements, then Ralf's
> situation could be handled via:
>
> def __init__(self as s, x as s.x, y as s.y, z as s.z):
> pass
>
> Essentially, it allows arguments to be given two names - a public name
> (before the 'as', used for keyword arguments), and a private name
> (after the 'as', not used for keyword arguments, allows easy shorthand
> aliasing of self, unpacking of tuple arguments, and easy assignment of
> instance variables).
There once was a suggestion like this on c.l.py, expanding this to other
statements, like:
if re.match('a.*b', text) as m:
# do something
What has become of this? It seems to be a wanted feature, and while I concur
that classic 'C-style' assignment-as-expression is undesirable (because of
the =/== bug-source), this would be a way, wouldn't it?
Reinhold
--
Mail address is perfectly valid!
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
