В Срд, 20/07/2005 в 21:58 -0300, Facundo Batista пишет: > On 7/20/05, Martin Blais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Well, maybe you're reading a bit too litterally into that statement. > > To me the expression is very explicitly absent :-) More seriously, > > reading into these rules too literally leads to funny places: I could > > ask why at the end of functions there is an implicit "return None" > > (I'm not expecting an answer). Explicit better than implicit? > > See your point. > > But, for me (spanish speaker), if I read a ``while:``, I think, "while what?". >
The same here, so -1 for while: Ruslan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
