>>>>> "Donovan" == Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Donovan> Yeah. IMHO the sadest thing about SVN is it doesn't do
Donovan> branch/merge properly. All the other cool stuff like
Donovan> renames etc is kinda undone by that. [...] This is why
Donovan> I don't bother migrating any existing CVS projects to
Donovan> SVN; the benefits don't yet outweigh the pain of
Donovan> migrating.
FWIW, XEmacs just had this discussion, and we basically came to the
conclusion that for a multi-developer project it's _definitely_ worth
the effort if it can be done by cvs2svn (which for us it probably
can't, due to some black magic we did on the CVS repository a few
years ago :-( ). For the record, I was opposed for exactly the reason
you give, but changed my mind.
The point is that with several developers there's almost surely
someone enthusiastic enough about svn to bear the burden of fooling
with the script for a couple of hours to see if it works, a fascist
policy about migrating account names makes that almost trivial, and
after that it's all gravy: the administration does not look any worse,
the security issues are similar, and the change is likely to incite
only a few people to press for account name changes after the move.
--
School of Systems and Information Engineering http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Ask not how you can "do" free software business;
ask what your business can "do for" free software.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
