On Fri, Aug 12, 2005, David Goodger wrote: > > Barry Warsaw and I, the PEP editors, have been discussing the > need for a new PEP type lately. Martin von L?wis' PEP 347 was > a prime example of a PEP that didn't fit into the existing > Standards Track and Informational categories. We agreed upon a > new "Process" PEP type. For more information, please see PEP 1 > (http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0001.html) -- the type of which has > also been changed to Process.
Go ahead and make PEP 6 a Process PEP. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ The way to build large Python applications is to componentize and loosely-couple the hell out of everything. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
