On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 12:27 -0400, Nicholas Bastin wrote: > On 8/8/05, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Nicholas Bastin wrote: > > > It's a mature product. I would hope that that would count for > > > something. > > > > Sure. But so is subversion. > > I will then assume that you and I have different ideas of what 'mature' means.
Bigger projects than Python use it and consider it mature for real use (All the Apache projects, all of KDE, GNOME is planning on switching soon, etc). I've never seen a corrupted FSFS repo, only corrupted BDB repos, and I will happily grant that using BDB ended up being a big mistake for Subversion. Not one that could have easily been foreseen at the time, but such is life. But this is why FSFS is the default for 1.2+ I've never seen you post about a corrupted repository to svn-users or svn-dev or file a bug, so i can't say why you see corrupted repositories if they are FSFS ones. --Dan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
