On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 04:30, Benji York wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>Granted. What is the cost of waiting a bit longer to see if it (or > >>something else) gets more usable and would hit the mark better than svn? > > > > It depends on what "a bit" is. Waiting a month would be fine; waiting > > two years might be pointless. > > This might be too convoluted to consider, but I thought I might throw it > out there. We use svn for our repositories, but I've taken to also > using bzr so I can do local commits and reversions (within a particular > svn reversion). I can imagine expanding that usage to sharing branches > and such via bzr (or mercurial, which looks great), but keeping the > trunk in svn.
Not too convoluted at all; I already do exactly this with many upstream CVS and SVN repositorys, using a local PRCS for my own branches. I'm considering switching to a distributed RCS for my own branches because it would make it easier for others to share them. I think this probably is the best solution; it gives a reliable(?) centralised RCS for the trunk, but allows distributed development. -- Donovan Baarda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
