Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 07:42, Michael Hudson wrote: > >> The third set of people who count are pydotorg admins. I'm not really >> one of those either at the moment. While SF's CVS setup has it's >> problems (occasional outages; it's only CVS) it's hard to beat what it >> costs us in sysadmin time: zero. > > True, although because of the peculiarities of cvs, there have > definitely been times I wish we had direct access to the repository. > svn should make most of those reasons moot. > > As for sysadmin time with the changes proposed by the pep -- clearly > they won't be zero, but I think the overhead for svn itself will be > nearly so.
OK, that's more or less what I thought. [...] > I'd be happy to switch to svn now, while continuing to experiment > and follow the better scm systems for the future. I suppose another question is: when? Between 2.4.2 and 2.5a1 seems like a good opportunity. I guess the biggest job is collection of keys and associated admin? Cheers, mwh -- well, take it from an old hand: the only reason it would be easier to program in C is that you can't easily express complex problems in C, so you don't. -- Erik Naggum, comp.lang.lisp _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
