On 8/17/05, Christian Robottom Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've done some searching through my code and id() isn't the most-used > builtin, so from my perspective the impact would be limited, but of > course others might think otherwise.
All of my primary uses of id would not show up in such a search. id is handy when debugging, when using the interactive interpreter and temporarily in scripts (print id(something), something for when repr(something) doesn't show the id). In my experience teaching python, id at the interactive interpreter is invaluable, which is why any proposal to move it would get a -1. The fundamental issue is that I want to explain reference semantics well before I talk about packages and the associated import call. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
