Josiah Carlson wrote: > Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I agree that an operator.methodcaller() shouldn't try to support >>multiple methods. OTOH, the syntax >> methodcall.method(*args, **kwargs) >>doesn't really lend itself to multiple methods either. > > > But that's OK, we don't want to be calling multiple methods anyways, do > we? I'd personally like to see an example it makes sense if someone > says that we do.
Several people argued that the version with a string method name should be added "for consistency". I only pointed out that doing so would not be completely consistent. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
