On 8/26/05, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doubt it. The problem with returning None is that it tests as False,
> but so does 0, which is a valid string index position. The reason
> string.find() returns -1 is probably to allow a test:
>
> if line.find("\f"):
> ... do something
This has a bug; it is equivalent to "if not line.startswith("\f"):".
This mistake (which I have made more than once myself and have seen
many times in code by others) is one of the main reasons to want to
get rid of this style of return value.
> Might add a boolean "str.contains()" to cover this test case.
We already got that: "\f" in line.
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
