Wolfgang Lipp wrote: > On Sat, 27 Aug 2005 12:35:30 +0200, Martin v. Löwis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > P.S. Emphasis mine :-) > > no, emphasis all **mine** :-) just to reflect i never expected .get() > to work that way (return an unsolicited None) -- i do consider this > behavior harmful and suggest it be removed.
Just because you don't read the documentation and guessed wrong d.get() needs to be removed?!? It's a *feature* of d.get(k) to never raise KeyError. If you need an exception, why not just use d[k]? Just _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
