Hi, How about piece() ? Anthony can have his "e"s that way too! ;-) and it's the same number of characters as .split().
Cheers, --ldl On 8/29/05, Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 30 August 2005 11:26, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > > My major issue is with the names - partition() doesn't sound right to > > > me. > > > > FWIW, I am VERY happy with the name partition(). > > I'm +1 on the functionality, and +1 on the name partition(). The only other > name that comes to mind is 'separate()', but > a) I always spell it 'seperate' (and I don't need another lamdba <wink>) > b) It's too similar in name to 'split()' > > Anthony > > -- > Anthony Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > It's never too late to have a happy childhood. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ldlandis%40gmail.com > -- LD Landis - N0YRQ - from the St Paul side of Minneapolis _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
