Michael Chermside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Hoffman writes:
> > Dare I ask whether the uncompiled versions [of re object methods] should
> > be considered for removal in Python 3.0?
> >
> > *puts on his asbestos jacket*
> 
> No flames here, but I'd rather leave them.

Me too.  I have various programs that construct lots of large REs on the fly,
knowing they'll only be used once.  Not having to compile them to objects
inline makes the code cleaner and easier to read.

Charles
-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon                           <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPL'ed software available at:               http://pyropus.ca/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to