Guido van Rossum wrote: > On 9/1/05, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>string.Template is a bit too simplified. But perhaps it can be adapted. >>We still want some way to express %r, %6.2f, etc. Since string >>formatting has been around since Tim was in diapers, we should probably >>start by looking at the solutions used by other languages. With Py3.0, >>we have a real opportunity to break-away from doing things the way C >>does it. > > > Hrm. Most other languages these days do floating point formatting the > way C does it. I'm happy to look for other ways to invoke the thing, > but I think that we shouldn't tinker with %6.2f. (In fact, the major > complaint is about the one place where I *did* tinker with it -- > %(boo)s.) > > Maybe the ${boo} form can be extended to allow ${boo%6.2f} ??? > > Unfortunately that would prevent a different extension of ${boo}: %{boo+far}.
May I also suggest the following shortcut for creating and evaluating a string template. (Ever since I thought of this, I've actually used this in code without thinking... it's just too natural): message = $"Hello, $name!" Shane _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com