"Paolino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What if I want to chain an infinite list of iterables? > Shouldn't itertools.chain be built to handle that? Raymond already suggested a four-line function that does exactly that. Create your own personal-library modules containing the functions you find useful as building blocks, and when you have a large sw base using them, present your building blocks along with their use cases as arguments for inclusion in the standard library. > I don't think it is a problem to accept only the second case you paste > and produce TypeError on the others. It would break compatibility with the current uses of itertools.chain . I like it (and have used it) as it is. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
