Fredrik Lundh wrote: > (you completely missed the point -- today's print mechanism works on *any* > object > that implements a "write" method, no just file objects. saying that "oh, all > you need is > to add a method" or "here's a nice mixin" doesn't give you a print > replacement)
While we're on the subject, in Py3k I'd like to see readline(), readlines(), etc. removed from file objects and made builtin functions instead. It should only be necessary to implement read() and write() to get a file-like object having equal status with all others. Greg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com