Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 9/3/05, Bill Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> So here's the summary of the arguments against: two style points >> (trailing comma and >>stream) (from the man who approved the current >> decorator syntax!), and it's hard to extend. (By the way, I agree that >> the ">>" syntax is ugly, and IMO a bad idea in general. Shame the "@" >> wasn't used instead. :-) >> >> Seems pretty weak to me. Are there other args against? > > Sure. I made the mistake of thinking that everybody knew them.
[...] > But more important to me are my own experiences exploring the > boundaries of print. [...] Gnnnnnyagh, couldn't you have *started* the thread with that post? :) Cheers, mwh -- Get out your salt shakers folks, this one's going to take more than one grain. -- Ator in an Ars Technica news item _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
