On Mon, Sep 19, 2005, Jonathan LaCour wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger:
>>
>> P.S.  Simplifying "and" and "or" may create a need to introduce a
>> conditional operator but that is a discussion for another day.
> 
> While I don't disagree with some of your main points, I do think that  
> your proposal would eliminate a natural and easy to understand use of  
> the current behavior of "or" that I tend to use quite a bit.  Your  
> proposal would break a lot of code, and I can't think of a better  
> "conditional operator" than the one thats already there.
> 
> I often find myself using 'or' to conditionally select a meaningful  
> value in the absence of a real value:
> 
>      person = Person.fetch(id=5)
>      name = person.name or 'John Doe'
>      birth_date = person.birth_date or '00-00-0000'
>      ssn = person.social_security or 'not provided'

While I'm in philosophical agreement with Raymond, it's also true that my
current company's code is littered with constructs like yours.  So I have
to say that it would break too much code.
-- 
Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

The way to build large Python applications is to componentize and
loosely-couple the hell out of everything.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to