I agree with Skip. Bill
> I suppose this is a dead horse now, but I will kick it one more time. > > Under the rubrics of "explicit is better than implicit" and "there should > only be one wat to do it", I would rather see > > bool_val = bool(foo or bar) > > instead of having the "or" operator implicitly call bool() for me. There's > clear value to the current semantics and it's so easy to get a boolean if > you want it, I see no reason for a change. > > Skip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
