On 10/10/05, Barry Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-10-10 at 01:47, Calvin Spealman wrote: > > > Never created for a reason? lumping things together for having the > > similar usage semantics, but unrelated purposes, might be something to > > avoid and maybe that's why it hasn't happened yet for decorators. If > > ever there was a makethreadsafe decorator, it should go in the thread > > module, etc. I mean, come on, its like making a module just to store a > > bunch of unrelated types just to lump them together because they're > > types. Who wants that? > > Like itertools? > > +1 for a decorators module.
+1 from me as well. And placing defaultproperty in there makes sense if it is meant to be used as a decorator and not viewed as some spiffy descriptor. Should probably work in Michael's update_meta() function as well (albeit maybe with a different name since I think I remember Guido saying he didn't like the name). -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
