Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > BTW, Queue.Queue violates a recent module naming standard; it is now > > > considered bad style to name the class and the module the same. > > > Modules and packages should have short all-lowercase names, classes > > > should be CapWords. Even the same but different case is bad style. > > > > unfortunately, this standard seem to result in generic "spamtools" modules > > into which people throw everything that's even remotely related to "spam", > > followed by complaints about bloat and performance from users, followed by > > various more or less stupid attempts to implement lazy loading of hidden in- > > ternal modules, followed by more complaints from users who no longer has > > a clear view of what's really going on in there... > > > > I think I'll stick to the old standard for a few more years... > > Yeah, until you've learned to use packages. :(
what does packages has to do with this ? does this new module naming standard only apply to toplevel package names ? </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
