>> Phillip J. Eby wrote:
>> > Anyway, my main question is, do these sound like worthwhile
>> > optimizations?
>>
>> In the past, I think the analysis was always "no". It adds an opcode,
>> so increases the size of the switch, causing more pressure on the
>> cache, with an overall questionable effect.
Phillip> Hm. I'd have thought 5% pystone and 2% pybench is nothing to
Phillip> sneeze at, for such a minor change.
We've added lots of new opcodes over the years. CPU caches have grown
steadily in that time as well, from maybe 128KB-256KB in the early 90's to
around 1MB today. I suspect cache size has kept up with the growth of
Python's VM inner loop. At any rate, each change has to be judged on its
own merits. If it speeds things up and is uncontroversial
implementation-wise, I see no reason it should be rejected out-of-hand.
(Send it to Raymond H. He'll probably sneak it in when Martin's not
looking. <wink>)
Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
