David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For years, Boost.Python has been doing some hacks to work around the fact > that a Windows Python distro doesn't include the debug build of the library. [...] > Having to download the Python source and build the debug DLL was deemed > unacceptable.
I'm curious: why was this "deemed unacceptable"? Python's license is about as liberal as it gets, and the code is almost startlingly easy to compile -- easier than any other similarly-sized codebase I've had to work with. Charles -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles Cazabon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GPL'ed software available at: http://pyropus.ca/software/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
