Nick Coghlan wrote: > Please consider looking at and commenting on PEP 328 - I got zero feedback > when I wrote it, and basically assumed no-one else was bothered by the -m > switch's fairly significant limitations (it went in close to the first Python > 2.4 alpha release, so we wanted to keep it simple).
Oops, that should be PEP 3*3*8. PEP 328 is something completely different. That'll teach me to post without checking the PEP number ;) Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brisbane, Australia --------------------------------------------------------------- http://boredomandlaziness.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com