Jim Jewett wrote: > (6) Mark Hammond suggests that it might be easier to > replace the interactive portions of python based on the > "code" module. matplotlib suggests using ipython > instead of standard python for similar reasons. > > If that is really the simplest answer (and telling users > which IDE to use is acceptable), then ... I think Michiel > has a point.
really? Python comes with a module that makes it trivial to get a fully working interpreter console under any kind of UI toolkit with very little effort, and you think that proves that we need to reengineer the CPython interpreter to support arbitary event loops so you don't have to use that module? as usual, you make absolutely no sense whatsoever. (or was "..." short for "CPython's interactive mode should use the code module" ?) </F> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
