On 11/13/05, Nick Coghlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Lee wrote: > > Implemented as you suggested and tested. I'll submit the patch to the > > tracker on sourceforge shortly. Are you guys still after contextual > > diffs as per the developer pages, or is an svn diff the preferred way to > > submit patches now? > > svn diff should be fine. Although I thought Brett had actually updated those > pages after the move to svn. . . >
I did. But the docs just need to be revamped. But I can't start on that work until people tell me if they prefer FAQ-style (question listing all steps and then a question covering each step) or essay-style (bulleted list and then a definition/paragraph on each step) for bug/patch guidelines. > > Thanks very much for all your help, Nick. It was extremely informative. > > I think we can chalk up a respectable win for the AST-based compiler - the > trick I suggested wouldn't really have been practical without the AST layer > between the parser and the compiler. > Yeah, this is a total win for the AST compiler. I would not have wanted to attempt this with the old CST compiler. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
