Brett Cannon wrote: > But this worry, in my mind, is alleviated since I believe both Michael > and Armin are willing to maintain the code. With them both willing to > make sure it stays working (which is a pretty damn good commitment > since we have two core developers willing to keep this going and not > just one) I think this worry is dealt with.
So far, neither of them has explicitly said so: Michael said he will be around; and I'm certain that is the case for Python as a whole. An explicit commitment to lsprof maintenance would help (me, atleast). > In other words, I say let Armin and Michael add lsprof and the > wrappers for it (all while removing any redundant profilers that they > have wrappers for) with them knowing we will have a public stoning at > PyCon the instant they don't keep it all working. =) I would prefer to see some advance support from lsprof users, confirming that this is really a good thing to have. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
