On 11/28/05, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neal Norwitz wrote: > > For those watching, Greg's and Martin's version were almost the same. > > However, Greg's version left in the memory leak, while Martin fixed it > > by letting the result fall through. > > Actually, Greg said (correctly) that his version also fixes the > leak: he assumed that FunctionDef would *consume* the references > being passed (whether it is successful or not).
Ah right, I forgot about that. Thanks for correcting me (sorry Greg). Jeremy and I had talked about this before. I keep resisting this solution, though I'm not sure why. n _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
