On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 17:19 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote: > I personally feel "cls" should be used for classmethods, and not > elsewhere. Just like I wouldn't like someone using "self" outside of > the first argument of instance methods. So class_ still would be a good > spelling elsewhere.
Here's what I've written: Function and method arguments Always use 'self' for the first argument to instance methods. Always use 'cls' for the first argument to class methods. If a function argument's name clashes with a reserved keyword, it is generally better to append a single trailing underscore rather than use an abbreviation or spelling corruption. Thus "print_" is better than "prnt". > I looked at that too, but most of these didn't jump out at me. I'll > copy in the parts that aren't already in PEP 8 that seem possible: > > From-imports should follow non-from imports. Dotted imports should > follow > non-dotted imports. Non-dotted imports should be grouped by increasing > length, while dotted imports should be grouped roughly alphabetically. > > This seems too complex to me for PEP 8. Really? ISTR adopting this convention from Guido, but I'm not 100% sure about that. After having used it for several years now, I do really like this style, but I'm willing to leave the recommendation out of PEP 8. -Barry
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com