Dave Cole wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
>>I've pushed out a revised PEP 8
>>
>>http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0008.html
>>
>>Please review and comment. Thanks everyone for providing an excellent
>>discussion. Hopefully I have captured our current collective
>>recommendations. I've also tried to simplify the text, while making it
>>(somewhat) more prescriptive.
>
>
> The only thing I strongly disagree with is the promotion of javaNaming
> to equal footing with python_naming. We can look forward to future
> programs that look like this:
I don't see this suggestion...? Here's what seems to be the current
text on the matter:
Function Names
Function names should be lowercase, with words separated by
underscores
as necessary to improve readability.
mixedCase is allowed only in contexts where that's already the
prevailing style (e.g. threading.py), to retain backwards
compatibility.
Method Names and Instance Variables
Use the function naming rules: lowercase with words separated by
underscores as necessary to improve readability.
I know Guido in a later thread seems to be going back on that, which
would be disappointing to me. I think it's reasonable to loosen the
phrasing a bit -- it's nearly always better to stay consistent with a
package than follow PEP 8 on this point. The current text merely
implies that it's acceptable to follow previous convention, not preferable.
Many people who come to Python *want* to follow whatever the prevalent
and preferred style is, but it's not immediately clear what that is. So
I think PEP 8 should as often as possible at least indicate preference.
Which it pretty much does now, so we should leave well enough alone ;)
--
Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
