On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:50:37PM -0800, Alex Martelli wrote: I'll answer here for all the people who kindly answered.
> Why would that be better than > any(o.some_attribute for o in some_objects) > ? I think it's because lately I've been using common lisp a lot and the approach with the test function is pretty common there. Of course I already knew all the alternatives using map and the generator expression, but I felt like mine was clearer for a reader, this is probably true but not enough to justify the change. One reason was to hide the iteration from the user and let python handle it, but I can see that this is both not enough and probably not even so necessary since the iteration protocol is already 'hidden' when using for..in. > What am I missing? Nothing, it's just me and the bad influence that lisp has on my mind :). Sorry to bother the list then. Thanks for the kind replies. -- Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone Now Running MacOSX 10.4 Blog: http://vvolonghi.blogspot.com http://weever.berlios.de
pgpeKPBtN4P2s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
