On 12/28/05, Noam Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/28/05, Adam Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Speaking of id, there's no reason why "id(a) == id(b)" has to fail for > > mismatched types in the face of persistence so long as the result of > > id() has the same lifetime as the target object. This could be done > > using weakrefs or by making an id type with a strong reference to the > > target object. > > I don't mean to change the current behaviour of id() - I just meant > that an additional one may be implemented, possible by a specific > library (Zope, for instance), so the built-in one shouldn't be used as > a fallback default.
Why aim low when you can aim for the face instead? :) -- Adam Olsen, aka Rhamphoryncus _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
