On 1/8/06, Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Martin] > >> But now: who is going to write it? "Guido should write it" clearly won't > >> work. And no, I'm explicitly not volunteering either. > > [Thomas] > > Well, the PEP will be mostly boilerplate anyway (unless there's a sudden > > influx of old ideas) so I'm sure I can whip something up before next > > weekend. I'll probably keep the actual list of rejected items to implicit > > self (which started the whole discussion), upgrading the Python parser > > beyond a simple LL(1), and maybe implicit ()'s for functioncalls, if I feel > > inspired. The exact wording, and additional rejects, can be discussed at > > length by those interested. > > I'll help with this. That means I want to and intend to, and will > discover that I can't actually make any time for it. With two of us > putting it off indefinitely, it should get done in half the time ;-).
Make it a third. I am willing to help out as needed since I already keep an eye out for Py3K stuff. Watching for stuff we don't want to discuss again is not that much harder. =) -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
