Scott David Daniels wrote: > Would "expect_fail", "expect_failure", "expected_fail", or > "expected_failure", work for you?
None of these use the same naming convention as the other unittest object attributes. Perhaps something like failureExpected? I'd definately prefer something that reads cleanly; mirroring the exact form of the word "fail" doesn't make sense; making it readable does. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
